Janet
Reno's Recurring Gulag
Jack Thompson
April 25, 2000
Read Articles by Jack Thompson in Hot
Topics
By seizing Elian and isolating him at an air force base, Janet Reno has
effectively cut this child off from his own lawyers.
Janet Reno has a long history of putting opposing parties illegally in
solitary confinement and isolation, denying them contact with those, including
their lawyers, who could help them.
Greg Craig's current refusal to allow Elian's attorneys to consult with their
client, Elian, whom the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals identified as the
"plaintiff" in the asylum proceedings, is being done with the
enthusiastic approval and cooperation of Janet Reno-because she has done it
before herself.
And it works.
Consider:
Reno showed up on the national political radar screen in the 1980's when she
successfully prosecuted Frank and Eliana (ironically the feminine form of the
name Elian) Fuster in the Country Walk child molestation case.
As reported here at NewsMax previously, Reno pioneered in that case the use
of child psychologists to examine children to determine if they had been
abused-a technique Reno refused to extend to Elian, presumably because of her
fear of what she might find.
Even more important in securing the convictions of the Fusters than the
testimony of the children was the testimony of Eliana, Frank's wife, who
"flipped" and became a witness against her husband and for Janet
Reno's prosecution.
How did Janet Reno accomplish that crucial flip? Persons came forward, who
are available to any Congressional committee wanting to hold hearings about the
Elian raid, who stated that Reno put Eliana, an attractive and shapely
19-year-old woman, into solitary confinement, stripped naked because she was on
a "suicide watch," in a Dade County jail cell, where Reno visited her
up to as many as thirty times alone, "consulting" with Eliana and
without disclosing the fact that the meetings were occurring to Eliana's
criminal defense lawyer at the time, Michael Van Zanft.
For Reno to have spoken to a criminal defendant, during the pendency of the
criminal proceedings, without disclosing such contacts to opposing counsel, is a
breach of the Code of Ethics for a lawyer of the highest magnitude.
What is more, witnesses can swear that when Eliana's testimony was taken in
the criminal proceeding, Janet Reno, the prosecutor of Eliana who was a criminal
defendant at the time, sat next to Eliana and held Eliana's hand during the
deposition.
This behavior of Reno, both ethical, bizarre, and possibly perverse, was
intended to assure the testimony Reno needed to convict Frank Fuster. How does
this writer know all this?
This writer was Eliana Fuster's attorney in her subsequent divorce from Frank
Fuster brought by this writer wearing his lawyer's and not his journalist's hat,
in 1986. I know Eliana Fuster personally.
Subsequent to Eliana's release from prison and her deportation to Honduras,
Eliana attempted to recant her confession and her testimony against her former
husband.
Her lawyers had brought Eliana Fuster back to this country where she planned
to recant, under oath, her confession and testimony against Frank Fuster, and
she was prepared to state that Reno broke her down with the solitary
confinement, removal of Eliana's clothing, and unethical debriefing of her
without her counsel present.
But frightening pressure was placed upon Eliana by Janet Reno and the INS for
her not to do so, threats to prevent Eliana's desired ultimate return to the
United States as a citizen.
Gentle reader, does any of what was done to Eliana Fuster remind you of what
is going on now with Elian?
The use of isolation to break an opposing party, in this case a six-year-old
boy denied his absolute right to meet with his attorneys.
You want another example of Reno's illegal isolation or sequestering of an
opposing party in order to deny him his legal rights?
Talk to the South Florida lawyers representing, at the time, Grant Snowden,
most decorated police officer in the history of the South Miami Police
Department.
The celebrated and respected editorialist of The Wall Street Journal, Dorothy
Rabinowitz, and the award-winning senior editor of Readers' Digest, Trevor
Armbrister, both have written of the shredding of Officer Snowden's rights by
Janet Reno and her child sex abuse unit, thereby securing a conviction and
incarceration of Snowden for seven years.
Snowden's conviction was overturned, ultimately, by the appellate courts
because of the improper conduct of Reno and her ethics-free legal beagles.
When the final push to spring Snowden was on, Snowden was put in solitary
confinement, clearly upon the order of Reno, to keep Snowden from getting his
mail and otherwise communicate with the outside world.
Eliana to Snowden to Elian. All a seamless continuum. All of it part of this
corrupt lawyer Janet Reno's career-long habit of not just bending the rules but
breaking them over her knee, along with the spirits and the rights of those she
would destroy. Greg Craig is Reno's latest accomplice in Janet's recurring
gulag.
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals needs to take note of what is going on
here, what has gone on with this Amazon Lawyer from Hell for years.